Tested product in 5 days. Why teams choose Humbleteam over Chipsa
Chipsa is a design studio known for animated websites, WebGL, 3D, and CGI. We are a product design company: in 5 days our team took a banking MVP from zero to a product tested with users, and we go deep in fintech and healthtech.
Facts about Chipsa from their own site and LinkedIn · October 7, 2026
How each company describes itself
Chipsa
Chipsa’s about page says: “We are a design collective driven by philosophy, beauty and code.” The studio has worked since 2009 and lists 30 people. It sells websites with elaborate animation, web and mobile interfaces, and CGI graphics, plus Spark, a visual concept it creates in 5 days.
The site lists 57 awards, including 35 from CSS Design Awards and 10 from Awwwards. Key clients shown are LG, McDonald’s, Iiko, and Daigo. LinkedIn lists 11–50 employees, located in Georgia.
Humbleteam
Five days is also our benchmark, and at the end of it users have tested a working product. That is how our ING Amsterdam team delivered a B2B banking MVP, and an average Humbleteam brief reaches a clickable prototype in 2 weeks.
We are 49 people in Prague and Dubai with 56 fintechs, 30+ major banks, and 30+ healthtech platforms studied behind us. Our record since 2017 reads 200+ projects and 80+ design awards, 14 of them Awwwards wins.
Three reasons teams pick us over Chipsa
Each one is about evidence from real users and real products.
User-tested product in 5 days
In 5 days our ING Amsterdam team moved a B2B banking MVP from zero to a product users had tested. For a longer brief, ING’s small-business banking prototype was designed and tested with users in 23 days. A first clickable prototype usually lands 2 weeks after the brief, and AI skills make our app and web design 20–40% faster.
Regulated products are our core
Banking and health apps live on states most portfolios skip: KYC failures, card limits, consent, and device errors. We have designed them for 56 fintechs and 30+ major banks, and for Eko Health’s digital stethoscope. Five YC-backed fintechs keep our designers inside their in-house team, so the patterns stay current.
80+ awards and 4.9 on Clutch
Our 200+ projects since 2017 have collected 80+ design awards, 14 of them from Awwwards. Clients rate us 4.9 on Clutch across 35 reviews, and speed, flexibility, and structure are the words that recur. Senior designers averaging 9 years of experience take your first call.
Humbleteam vs Chipsa, side by side
Every Chipsa fact here is from their own site or LinkedIn page. Where they publish nothing, the row says so.
| Compared on | Humbleteam | Chipsa |
|---|---|---|
| Time to a tested prototype | 5 days from zero to a user-tested banking MVP with ING Amsterdam | Spark, a visual concept, in 5 days; user testing not published |
| Brief to first clickable prototype | 2 weeks on average | Not published on their site |
| Fintech and regulated depth | 56 fintechs and 30+ major banks | Not published on their site |
| AI in delivery | AI agents installed in your design team, in your accounts, with human review | AI named alongside websites, digital spaces, and CGI on their home page |
| Senior experience | 9 years on average for senior designers on a project | Not published on their site |
| Independent proof | 80+ design awards, 14 of them Awwwards; 4.9 on Clutch across 35 reviews | 57 awards listed, 10 of them Awwwards; no review rating published |
| Best known for | Product design for fintech, sport, healthtech, and AI products | Animated websites, WebGL, 3D, and CGI graphics |
When Chipsa is the better call
Two briefs where Chipsa’s craft is the better match.
A promo site built on 3D
If the brief is a launch website where WebGL, motion, and CGI carry the story, Chipsa’s portfolio and award list center on exactly that kind of site.
CGI visuals for a product range
Chipsa produces 3D product visualization and CGI content for sites, games, apps, and social channels. A campaign that needs rendered product imagery fits their graphics team.
What we bring to the table
Speed with users in the loop, and the record behind it.
5 days
zero to user-tested product
B2B banking MVP with ING Amsterdam
14
Awwwards wins
within 80+ design awards
56
fintechs shipped
plus 30+ major banks
Products you can check
Three cases where people use the product every day.
Put us on the shortlist.
Send your product and the decision you are trying to make. We reply with the cases closest to it, a timeline and an estimate — and we will say so if the other option is the better fit.
Questions?
Is Humbleteam a good alternative to Chipsa?
Yes, if you need a product that users can test and use daily. In 5 days our ING Amsterdam team took a B2B banking MVP from zero to a tested product, and we have shipped 56 fintechs since 2017. Chipsa is a studio known for animated websites, WebGL, 3D, and CGI, so for a showpiece promo site its portfolio is a strong reference.
Humbleteam or Chipsa: who delivers faster?
Both publish a 5-day offer, and they deliver different things. Chipsa’s Spark is a visual concept made in 5 days. In 5 days our team delivered a banking MVP that users had already tested, and an average Humbleteam brief reaches a clickable prototype in 2 weeks. Every new enquiry gets our answer within 24 hours.
Which is better for a banking or fintech app?
Humbleteam, since banking is where our portfolio runs deepest: 56 fintechs, 30+ major banks, and 5 YC-backed fintechs with our designers in their in-house team. Chipsa’s home and about pages name no fintech or banking work. On a first call, ask each team to show a KYC failure state and a card-limit screen they designed and tested.
How big is each team, and who does the work?
Humbleteam has 49 people in Prague and Dubai. Chipsa’s site lists 30 people, and LinkedIn shows 11–50 employees, located in Georgia. At Humbleteam the senior designers on a project average 9 years of experience, and the people on your first call are the people who design your product, from research to UX/UI and the design system.
How much does each cost, and how soon can we start?
Neither Chipsa nor Humbleteam publishes a price list. Chipsa’s site describes time and material billing after a preliminary assessment, with weekly reports. Humbleteam instead offers a fixed-price audit, a scoped implementation, or a monthly retainer, quoted on the first call. A product sprint with us can start next week, and enquiries get a reply within 24 hours.
Other comparisons
Same structure, same sourcing rules, one page per shortlist we keep meeting.
What we checked, and when
Everything stated about Chipsa on this page comes from their own public pages, read onOctober 7, 2026. We describe what they are strong at, not what they are bad at. If something here is out of date or wrong, write to hi@humbleteam.com and we will fix the page.
- chipsa.design — home, services, awards, and clients · read October 7, 2026
- chipsa.design — about the studio · read October 7, 2026
- LinkedIn — Chipsa company page · read October 7, 2026
Last updated
