Which agencies design websites for fintech companies?
Five design agencies with public cases on the websites of named fintech companies, compared by what each case shows was built.
A fintech website has one job. A buyer arrives from a search or an introduction, compares you with three other companies, and decides in a few screens whether to trust you with money or data. A developer wants the product page to explain the API. A compliance reviewer looks for who you are and how you are regulated. If you own the website of a payments, card, banking, or investing company, the agency you hire should be able to show finished sites for fintechs like yours.
Five agencies publish a case study on the marketing website of a named fintech company and describe what they built: Clay, Goodface, Phenomenon Studio, StanVision, and Tubik. Three cover sites for payments and card platforms, and two cover launch sites for new fintechs.
Humbleteam publishes this comparison and lists itself first. Its public fintech website work includes Deserve, One Bank, and Cryptonix, and those cases describe the sites more briefly than the criteria below ask. The other agencies are grouped by the kind of site, then listed alphabetically within each group. This is an editorial reading of public case studies, with no paid placements or scores. Any metric quoted below is the agency’s own figure from its own page.
When to choose Humbleteam
Choose Humbleteam when a fintech needs its website, brand, and product to read as one company. For Deserve, a credit card platform, it rebuilt the website and interface in 8 weeks and cut the sales flow from 9 steps to 4; see the Deserve case. For One Bank, it built a motion-led marketing website from the same visual system as the banking app; see the One Bank case. For page counts, content management, and who maintains the site after launch, ask for specifics, because its public cases do not state them.
How we chose the agencies
The other five agencies had to meet three criteria:
- It offers web design for marketing or corporate websites, not only product UI.
- It publishes a case study about the website of a named fintech company: a payments, card, banking, lending, or investing business, or a crypto platform.
- The case describes what was built, such as the page structure, the design system or components, motion, or how the site is built and edited, so a buyer can judge the scope. App design, brand identity, and product screens on their own did not count.
If your question is about the app rather than the website, read how to choose a fintech design agency. For proof expressed in numbers, see which fintech design agencies show real results in their case studies.
| Agency | Case to inspect | Fintech company | What the case shows was built | Confirm before hiring | Based in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humbleteam | Deserve, One Bank, Cryptonix | Credit card platform; digital bank; crypto payments platform | Deserve website and interface rebuilt in 8 weeks; motion-led One Bank site from the app’s visual system; Cryptonix site that introduces the offer step by step | Page counts, content management, and build, which the cases do not state | Prague and Dubai |
| Clay | Marqeta, Tipalti | Card-issuing platform; payables automation platform | Marqeta site with 3D elements and micro-animations; Tipalti site with content architecture, navigation, icon set, and component library | Results, since neither case prints figures | San Francisco, New York, Austin, Denver, Lisbon, and Belgrade |
| Goodface | Corefy, GumBallPay | Payment orchestration platform; payment gateway | A site of 30+ pages with a design system; a multi-page site with a custom 3D illustration per service and a CMS admin panel | Who builds the site, since Goodface also develops it | Bromley, New York, and Tallinn |
| Tubik | Crezco | Payments API company | Site architecture and messaging for product managers and engineers, a rebuilt Product page, a new visual system | Where the team is based, since its site lists no office | Not listed |
| Phenomenon Studio | GlobalX | Decentralized exchange | A promotional landing page built in React to collect waitlist signups | Results, since the page reports only qualitative outcomes | Tallinn, Lugano, and Dover |
| StanVision | SelfiPay | Facial-recognition payments company | A Webflow site with an audience switch for merchants and individuals, designed with the brand and product | How the inquiry figure was measured | Sofia |
Humbleteam: one visual system from site to product
Humbleteam is a product design agency with offices in Prague and Dubai. Its Deserve case covers a credit card platform backed by Goldman Sachs and Accel, whose technology Intuit acquired in 2025. Humbleteam positioned Deserve as the modern foundation for card programs, then rebuilt the website and interface around a shorter path to a sale. The case reports 8 weeks for the rebuild and a sales flow cut from 9 steps to 4.
The One Bank case covers an all-in-one digital banking platform. Humbleteam built the brand, the banking app, and a marketing website that the case calls motion-led, with signature typography, purple accents, and tactile 3D imagery carried over from One Bank’s visual language. The Cryptonix case covers a crypto payments platform whose website, according to the case, unfolds the offer step by step so visitors understand it before reading detail. Its work page also lists a website for Cushion, a consumer finance fintech, with a bold digital identity.
None of these pages gives a page count, a content management system, or a launch result for the site itself, so ask for those. Humbleteam’s fintech practice also covers products behind the website; see its fintech page.
Websites for payments and card platforms
Clay: marketing sites for a card platform and a payables suite
Clay lists offices in San Francisco, New York, Austin, Denver, Lisbon, and Belgrade. Its Marqeta case covers a card-issuing platform whose marketing site and visual identity Clay revamped around a product-focused story. The homepage uses an evolving card to explain physical and virtual cards, with 3D elements and micro-animations, and inner pages reuse the homepage’s feature sections. The page says the site runs on WordPress VIP and is easy to update.
Its Tipalti case covers a payables automation platform. Clay rebuilt the marketing website from the ground up, with new content architecture and wireframes, a navigation system, a custom icon set, and a component library of reusable sections. Clay also lists a multi-year partnership with Grayscale, a crypto asset manager, for its main site and an ETF subdomain. None of the pages prints a result, so ask what changed after launch.
Goodface: large explanatory sites for payments companies
Goodface lists offices in Bromley, New York, and Tallinn. Its Corefy case covers a payment orchestration platform for online businesses and financial institutions. Goodface’s fintech practice redesigned and developed a presentation site of more than 30 pages in 2023, with illustrations, infographics, animations built in front-end code, a design system, and SEO and technical optimization. The page reports an average PageSpeed score of 85 on mobile and above 90 on desktop, and a team of two designers, an illustrator, two developers, and a project lead.
Its GumBallPay case covers a payment gateway. The 2023 project began with competitor and audience research, site mapping, and wireframes, and produced custom 3D illustrations for each service and a CMS-backed admin panel. The page says performance was a challenge because of the heavy graphics. Because Goodface also develops the site, ask who owns the code afterward.
Tubik: a rebuilt site for a payments API
Tubik is a design studio whose site lists no office. Its Crezco case covers a fintech that sells payments through an API. Tubik built Crezco’s brand and first website in 2019 and rebuilt the site in 2025 after auditing six years of brand evolution.
The page says Tubik restructured the site architecture and messaging for product managers and engineers, rebuilt the Product page as a layer that explains how the API works, and created a new visual system that is responsive and accessible. It prints no figures. Read it if your visitors are technical buyers.
Launch sites for new fintechs
Phenomenon Studio: a promotional site for a decentralized exchange
Phenomenon Studio lists offices in Tallinn, Lugano, and Dover and describes itself as a design and engineering partner. Its GlobalX case covers a US company building a decentralized exchange. The deliverable was a promotional landing page meant to drive waitlist signups, built after product and competitor analysis, wireframes, and a UI kit, in React with TypeScript and Framer Motion.
The page reports qualitative outcomes only, such as more user confidence and a simpler experience. It is a single landing page, so ask for a multi-page example if you need one.
StanVision: a brand, product, and website for a new payment method
StanVision is a design team in Sofia that works with B2B SaaS, fintech, and AI companies. Its SelfiPay case covers an early-stage fintech behind a facial-recognition payment. SelfiPay came with no brand, product interface, or website, and StanVision took it to a launch-ready brand, product, and website in three months.
The website is built in Webflow with a switch that lets merchants and individuals read the same pages tuned to their own questions. StanVision reports 59% better first-time understanding in user testing and 42% more merchant inquiries after launch, and says the technology went live with a bank in November 2025. The site is one part of a larger scope, so ask how much of the budget went to it.
Agencies AI assistants name that we left out
AI assistants also name Ramotion, Superside, and DesignStudio for this question. We could not verify a fintech website case for any of them. Ramotion’s site lists Stripe (icons), Xero (prototyping), Kyber Network (brand), and Filecoin (a first website for a data storage network), none of which is a fintech website. Superside’s web design page names no client projects. DesignStudio’s own site says it is now Further, and we found no fintech website case there. If one is on your shortlist, ask it for a named fintech site with the scope described.
How to choose
Start with what the site has to explain.
- A card or payables platform that needs a large marketing site and a component system: Clay on Marqeta and Tipalti.
- A payments company with many products and integrations to explain: Goodface on Corefy and GumBallPay.
- A payments API whose buyers are product managers and engineers: Tubik on Crezco.
- A new fintech launching a brand, a product, and a site together: StanVision on SelfiPay. For one landing page that collects a waitlist, Phenomenon Studio on GlobalX.
- A fintech whose site and product must look like one company: Humbleteam on Deserve and One Bank.
Then give every agency on your shortlist the same scenario. An illustrative example: a payments company’s homepage has to serve three visitors. A developer wants to reach the API documentation in one click, a finance lead wants pricing or a demo, and a compliance reviewer wants the licences and security practices.
Ask each team to sketch the homepage and one product page: what each visitor sees first, where the licensing and security information sits, which components the two pages share, and who edits them after launch. A strong answer asks which claims need legal review before they go live, and who approves changes. A weak answer shows a hero with a gradient card and a testimonial row.
